The Islah axis has rebelled against legitimacy
English - Monday 16 August 2021 الساعة 04:32 pm
NewsYemen, Written by/Faisal Al-Sufi:
Three parties in Taiz said their words about the crime of genocide that was carried out by the military within two days, and these parties are: the Secretariat of the Yemeni Socialist Party Organization, the Nasserist Unionist Organization Branch, and the National Arab Socialist Baath Party Branch.
The branch of Hadi’s conference in Taiz did not comment a word, and Aref Jamil’s silence about the crime of genocide is a permanent shame.
As for the Islah party, its silence is justified, because the perpetrators of the crime, their facilitators, and their protectors belong to the Islah party, and it felt embarrassed.
This clearly appears through the desperate attempts of the Islah members to conceal the crime and draw attention to matters far from it.
A team tried to occupy people with the issue of the British occupation for Al-Mahra and a team excavating the assassination case in Aden suddenly.
A miserable team imagined prisons, violations and assassinations on the western coast that only existed in a feverish head babbling, another team raised the level of Emirati intervention in Yemen and a team that was exhausting itself with the Southern Transitional Council.
Before the three parties’ statement, members of the House of Representatives asked President Hadi to quickly form a neutral military-security presidential committee and assign it to urgently go to the city of Taiz to find out the overall security imbalances in the city and the governorate and determine who is behind them.
It seems to us from the first moment that the three parties still need to prove that the authority of the Islah Party in Taiz has become transcendent over the president and the parliamentary and judicial presidencies.
In a clearer sense, the Islah Party has had its own project in Taiz, and it has strengthened and imposed its entrenchments from every side, security and military, they cannot abandon their military and security leaders, no matter what atrocities and atrocities are committed
The crime of genocide did not terrify the members of Parliament enough, in their letter addressed to President Hadi, they saw the crime of genocide as a good occasion (to find out the overall security imbalances)! We believe that anyone who reads the list of the thirty-two MPs will understand why their demand was humble in the face of a resounding crime that took place in the Amad neighborhood in the city of Taiz.
The crime terrified the leaders of the three esteemed party branches, but what is the point of addressing the president about it, as long as the de facto authority in Taiz is rebellious against him?
If the crime of genocide represented a concern for members of the House of Representatives, they would have formed an investigation committee from the members of the House of Representatives themselves, or pressure the presidency to conduct an impartial and impartial judicial investigation
However, it seems that the Speaker of the House of Representatives, who recently interacted with unimportant matters, has become convinced that the military leaders in Taiz have become rebellious against the legitimacy, and above the president, and thus he saw avoiding the presidency as more embarrassment.
For nearly three years, until last Wednesday, the Prime Minister has been issuing successive directives to the military and security leaders in Taiz.. Every violation is followed by a directive, every crime is followed by a directive, and every time he says to the interlocutors: What is happening is no longer acceptable.. It is considered acceptable, it has become the accepted one, and it is always prevalent because the modernists have become a de facto authority.
During the same period, President Hadi issued more than one decision and more than one directive. There was no effect on the social space of the city of Taiz, and instead, appointment decisions were issued by the same group.
As for Nabil Shamsan, the representative of the President of the Republic in the governorate of Taiz, he is also like Tariq al-Manaya..a day in the city..a week he flees to the soil..then Aden..and from Aden he rides either to Riyadh or to Cairo, seeking safety.. Shamsan escaped from killing More than once, and the military stormed his office more than once, and the doors of the local authority were closed by officers in the national army many times.. The actors are protected by their higher leaders, and they are prevented from being held accountable.. The rebels against this legitimacy are the most groups that claim to uphold legitimacy, protect legitimacy, and defend legitimacy.
